Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Not in my backyard: Liberals, Nationals go cold on nuclear, page-9

First 9 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
pintohoo

96,638 Posts.

75

25/03/24

20:00

Post #: 73050980
Share

Originally posted by pugsley100 ↑

because if we're talking about big nukes ----------- there's not much coastal land that's cheapand, that's where they would go - on the coast

The Coalition are talking about replacing existing coal fired power stations with big bespoke nuclear power plants these days.
They're campaigning to stop new transmission lines over agricultural land and instead spend some of the money subsidising rooftop solar and batteries for rural and regional homes.
Eraring owned by Origin energy in the Labor held seat of Hunter which is earmarked for closure next year is already connected to the grid.
There is speculation that Eraring which currently supplies around 18% of NSW electricity will be subsidised by either taxpayers or electricity customers to keep it operating longer seeing that Snowy 2.0 is running behind schedule.
The subsidy would pay for future maintenance costs to keep it running past it's use by date.
Some of the area in proximity to the plant is already ugly just like parts of the nearby Newcastle.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/R6WjVmSnYuTQGkba7

Expand

Cooling water will come from Lake Macquarie and at a guess - more will be required and a backup

and Newcastle not far away

oh, and I wonder where the cooling water will be piped to after it leaves the plant?

Lotsa luck dutto
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

LU7

Lithium Universe targets silver boom with breakthrough solar recycling tech

LIS

Li-S Energy the latest microcap to pivot to US defence market

LDX

Lumos Diagnostics surges 140% on major US contract deal

ASX Market Close: Why are we red today? Because US CPI's at 3%

First 9 Last

SPONSORED BY