push your chips in the middle of the table, page-33

Maybe I have a touch of Holy's Alvin the Idiot in me.

Can someone walk me through the logic of why it is in ESG's (and my) interests to sit on gas flow and commercialisation information that is assumed to be so good as to move the sp in the right direction.

If a takeover is inevitable, why wouldn't ESG want the sp as high as possible at all times?

Doesn't refusing to release in this instance simply leave them vulnerable to an opportunistic takeover?

Dex