It is the way it is reported in the heading.
No one does or should report xrf readings like that at this stage.
They would have you believe at first look that what they call "zone 1" Lol is 7m at 7% copper and or 3% copper.
When in fact you have a possible little pleb of copper in 2 parts of that "zone" and the rest is rubbish.
Same for all the other areas.
We already knew they had uneconomical bits of copper out here. i thought we all wanted niobium like WA1?
There is none of that it appears!
Ann: Copper Sulphides Intercepted at West Arunta, page-30
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 326 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
