19m @ 179 g t, page-41

Overall, I don't share your enthusiasm Dott. Hope I am wrong, but it smells a little fishy.

There are a number of holes shown on the cross sections (R-xxx) that are not listed in the appendix to the announcement (which I thought was compulsory)

There are a number of drill holes above the 179g/t sample that seem to be 'dusters' (particularly the R-xxx), which adds to my 'nuggetty' suspicion.

Some of the KS-xx results seem to be re-assays. Why were they re-assayed?

Yes, some deposits that were uneconomic 10 years ago would be economic today, but something that is a 'company maker' today, would have been at least 'interesting' 10 years ago. 12 months ago, this dirt wasn't worth putting on DRA's presentations, but Hanhimaa was.

Anyway, further drill results should clarify. Some will wait with anticipation, I will have trepidation. Hoping for good results.

While I am at it, I would also be pleased if they actually hit a production target. 3 years following this company, and I don't think I have seen them hit an annual target yet.