I didn't say that at all, did I Truffles? My point was simply that the general consensus seemed to be that we had already moved beyond the public consultation phase which was occurring in April 2023. Therefore celebrating a hurdle that was presumed to have been cleared already seems illogical. If I had mentioned a week ago that AGY still had additional public consultation requirements, I would have likely faced relentless ridicule from those who were emphasising that all that was needed was Romy's formal approval of the EIA.
I understand the desire for positive developments to grasp onto, but this situation is pretty laughable. Amidst all the excitement about a town-hall meeting, several other missed deadlines have been overlooked. I suppose that was JZ's intention, so I should give him credit for his little sleight of hand. Or of course it could just be that holders are conditioned to understand that JZ's guidance is meaningless.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
