actually the only reason that you don’t know my views is because you refuse to read them. Or because you think I haven’t used the right words to describe my feelings.
that is zealotry, bias and intellectually dishonest. if you were truly a pacifist rather then a self centred and biased commentator you would accept that people can express themselves differently- but you can’t. You would accept that there is nothing incompatible with taking a good hard look at history and how things have unfolded and my views bout Netanyahu. But you can’t. For you instead of standing comfortably in your moral position you must twist facts, denigrate others, and refuse to read their posts properly. That type of thinking is precisely what leads to war and is no better then the Palestinians and indirectly Hamas that you defend, because of the way you debate, or the Israelis that you so vigorously despise
But if you feel comfortable that the only way you can get the support and agreement you need is to sidle up to the worst antisemite, the one who wishes death and destruction to any with whom he does not identity and flings abuse around freely you probably want to take a good hard look at yourself. Shame on you
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Wong’s Palestine call has been criticised as ‘a win for terrorists’ by the Coalition
Wong’s Palestine call has been criticised as ‘a win for terrorists’ by the Coalition, page-553
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 336 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online