Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Lehrmann defamation trial judgement today, page-160

First 160 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
nippy

14,795 Posts.

892

15/04/24

15:41

Post #: 73352213
Share

Originally posted by LouisVuitton: ↑

Yes I can use google but if you are bringing data into the convo, it helps to be able to reference the same data for the discussion...

"Those 30% had a reason to think a test was necessary and the actual % for thw whole population is smaller but the point is made." This is a very important piece of context which was missing from your original statement....
"Of all the possible fathers who take a paternity test, about 32% are not the biological father. But remember, this is 1/3 of men who have a reason to take a paternity test - not 1/3 of all men. That is a huge difference!" From your own resource, yes your point was made but you have used this data incorrectly by trying to tie this to ALL MEN.....

As your own resource states "this is 1/3 of men who have a reason to take a paternity test - not 1/3 of all men. That is a huge difference!" Just really focus on that last part please "not 1/3 of all men. That is a huge difference!"

Expand

I have never said ALL MEN or ALL Woman.

I have in fact said a % of each are indeed angels.

I have said men who get drunk on dates need to worry given how the law works now. Not all men drink and not all women falsely accuse but it does happen,

The only one talking about ALL here is you.

Context once again.

Last edited by nippy: 15/04/24
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

GDM

Great Divide 'rapidly evolving' into commercial miner with first Challenger pour

BRU

Buru sinks -8% on adjusted Rafael Gas Project timeline aimed to 'reduce risk'

Unemployment expectations correctly called today's 4.3% rate

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

ASX Market Close: Pretty boring day, but we're back in the 8,600s

First 160 Last

SPONSORED BY