Had a quick look. One thing (amongst a number) I find a bit disturbing, Judge notwithstanding.
In the context of a rape, I suspect there would have been ejaculation.
Would a normal individual not have seen a doctor urgently (like yesterday) to ensure that the DNA, etc, were preserved?
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Lehrmann defamation trial judgement today
Lehrmann defamation trial judgement today, page-226
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 425 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)