That is an absolute and misleading statement to make.
If they are 'not happy' why would they request further evidence to consider the 2mg/kg?
Asking for the complete suite of information that supports the dosage actually sounds encouraging to me. They wouldn't put themselves through this burdensome extra review work if it was going to be clearly a 'No'. Rather, it suggests the collection and review of all available data to support a 'yes'.
Where we at?, page-338
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 369 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
25.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $89.19M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 70909 | 25.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 24.0¢ | 2586 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 09.46am 29/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PAR (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable