$2 PARTY, page-5125

I was threatened by Tradjected who said if I didn't like what he said, I should put him on ignore, so I did.

Tradjected has bad intentions with HC.

The critical point, as I've mentioned many times, is bad intentions.

Last week, I stated that, in my opinion, buying ZIP at less than $1.1x is good buying, and at $1.0x, it's a great buying.
I backed this belief by purchasing at these values last week.

Now, I’m in the green enough that if I wanted to buy a used Ducati Supersport, I could (if I also had a death wish).

Now, if ZIP suddenly drops to $0.47 or even $0.25, as Tradjected has postulated several hundred times last week, then I will have been proven profoundly wrong in hindsight—no doubt about that. But how does being wrong, even profoundly wrong, differ from bad intent, falseness, and grift? In my opinion, the difference is significant. Intent matters; it speaks to who we are. Tradjected is clearly not eating what he is cooking.

Stay away from the salmon mousse Tradjected is offering, unless you can independently validate its fecal matter content.