While we do have a disastrous SP record and all SH would be deflated by that situation, I am wondering if such a group would be warranted - and why.
Communication by IMU is relatively good compared to most companies listed on the ASX - not defending it but still worth mentioning.
Trials take time - and sometimes a very long time - so SH can't influence that course.
It is frustrating that SH are not privy to where the company sees its future development - including any activity for commercialisation - and, not countering the statement on timing for trials above - ant expected time lines.
Any issues that you think a SK avocacy group would be needed?
Why IMU is a multi multi bagger, page-23091
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2,821 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add IMU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
5.2¢ |
Change
-0.002(3.70%) |
Mkt cap ! $382.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 5.4¢ | 5.4¢ | 5.2¢ | $148.9K | 2.828M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 31 | 2436853 | 5.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3¢ | 392814 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 22/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| IMU (ASX) Chart |