Well, no one could possibly compete with you for the winner of most rabid ramper, though several do try...
But I wasn't suggesting it will take 18 months to achieve the same level of progress, it wasn't a FUD post, I think it's fair to say I've been pretty balanced, I'm openly saying this announcement does show some progress etc. I'm clearly being far more balanced than you ever have been.
The point is that progress has been extremely slow, that's just how it is, and we can't just expect that suddenly it will be full speed ahead to nameplate. We've literally waited about five years to see any technical progress. It's great we finally have, but exactly what is the nature of that progress and while it's impossible to know the future rate of progress, we have to make some guesses, and just as an example I was using the previous rate of progress extrapolated to the future, which isn't some crazy FUDster figure.
The calculations being thrown around about the recent production rate, including by the bears including myself have excluded the recent down time. If we do that for the previous year, we don't actually see an amazing change in production. We're literally all, bulls and bears alike, being generous enough to calculate based on zero downtime going forward. We're yet to see evidence of significant increase in production rate - five years and counting. I don't know if that will happen within a week or month or year or decade, I was just giving one hypothetical. Since we've been waiting all these years including over a year on the current plant, I'm not expecting it to happen in the immediate future, and if you want to pretend that's FUD, that's a problem for anyone stupid enough to believe you, just like believing you has been for a long while.
For you to accuse anyone of being biased is absurd beyond words.
Expand
(20min delay)