Doesn’t matter what it costs if it provides 24/7 power for at least 50 years.
Zero carbon to worry the lovelies.
No wind turbine blades to have to bury after 15 years.
No solar panels to dispose of after 20 years.
No need for massive transmission lines destroying farmland to go ahead. They utilise existing infrastructure.
Snowy will cost 20 billion if it is ever completed. Which I seriously doubt.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Nuclear to cost $17b and twice as expensive as renewable energy
Nuclear to cost $17b and twice as expensive as renewable energy, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 226 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some
SKS
SKS Technologies wins US$90M award to supply power to international hyperscale data centre in Melbourne