Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Nuclear to cost $17b and twice as expensive as renewable energy, page-28

First 28 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Scott th Ratbag

47,124 Posts.

649

22/05/24

14:01

Post #: 73955206
Share

Originally posted by cowcockie: ↑

Doesn’t matter what it costs if it provides 24/7 power for at least 50 years.
Zero carbon to worry the lovelies.
No wind turbine blades to have to bury after 15 years.
No solar panels to dispose of after 20 years.
No need for massive transmission lines destroying farmland to go ahead. They utilise existing infrastructure.
Snowy will cost 20 billion if it is ever completed. Which I seriously doubt.

Expand

so you would be happy with your electricity price doubling?

get those panels and batteries in place and its all free from there.
4 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ESR

Estrella first foreign entity to win tenements in Timor-Leste under new laws ahead of 2025 tenders

The winners & losers on market if negative gearing were gone

The market's shrugged at China's stimulus measures all year. Why is this one different?

COD

Coda Minerals (ASX:COD) enters rights issue to further exploration in South Australia

NAM

ACCC seeks Olam divestments before it can buy Namoi Cotton

DEG

HotCopper users muse on De Grey's denial of Agnico Eagle takeover bid – but who are Agnico?

ACW

Actinogen Medical ramps up Alzheimer’s treatment trials, targeting fast-track global approvals

STK

5.6g/t gold intercept at Serbia's Rogozna supports Strickland's hopes for high-grade core

KAL

KalGold rolls out detailed aeromagnetic survey across Pinjin project

Week 39 Wrap: What HotCopper’s watching; China’s new stimmy moves boost metals; Oz CPI drop

There are more pages in this discussion • 201 more messages in this thread...

First 28 Last