Super pain as ALP faces another franking credits disaster, page-5

  1. 6,545 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 285
    Hi,
    Lots of misleading b/s in the Gottliebsen puff piece.
    The bit about industry funds is aimed at half wits who aren't capable of thinking past their right wing prejudices.
    For a start , how many people with balances over 3 million have it in an industry fund ?

    Anybody who has worked in the area , knows perfectly well that the sophistication of the industry funds back room is at least the equal of non-industry funds anyway.
    Not as easy to tease out the details from big funds as a self managed fund for obvious reasons.
    But not that hard though, think about members in growth and pension phase for a start.

    This doesn't have the same potential electoral disasters lurking as the ill thought out franking credits mess.
    This doesn't go deeply into the demographics as franking credits .
    Even if your very optimistic 1 million to 3 million over 10 years were to occur , numbers still piddly.

    However , despite the hysteria inherent in the article , this change is awful.
    It wont bring in much money , it adds complexity to the system , and taxing unrealised gains is unfair.
    For me , if you have more than 3 million , the excess should fall out of the super system back into your personal assets[ in truth I would set that RBL a tad lower, and get rid of the 15c tax in large pension accounts as well].
    I would rather see a continuation of the present system , plus taxation of withdrawals , with rebates for taxation already paid.





 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.