Ann: Annual General Meeting Results, page-89

Thats just only part of the questions. I just broke it up to identify the speaker. Most of the questions were fired by one holder upset and was cutting off the awnsers. But i think his appproach left us with significantly more nuggets and insite then what was know from the past which was dot going you could call it.

The argument of RSU your trying to pinpoint i think could be non issue if the right contract is signed and they customer thats the whole package. I suspect there is some serious talk about the whol package being they publicly said they are not taping 2.0 cause of competition with customer. So likely a non compete disclosure was signed and there is paperwork curculating for final approvals IMO the timeline and final acceptance is dependant on obviously the customer. It has to be serious though cause if you optioned out of building silicon and the deal was soft youd be out of your mind. And Seeing as some call Antonio aragant i dont think he would be the type to sign a soft deal. So IMO This has to have some serious legs.