Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Nuclear to cost $17b and twice as expensive as renewable energy, page-171

First 171 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
pints

73,309 Posts.

327

23/05/24

11:29

Post #: 73972255
Share

Originally posted by bghooper1967: ↑

Well I suppose the conversation has to start somewhere and the LNP are flagging nuclear as an option. Not any easy sell in Australia given most Aussies have been deadset against nuclear for a long time - we really had no need given our energy resources in the ground. But without coal or gas filling the baseline we will probably need another interim and then a backup energy source.
You could whack one on a coal power site and let in run while you build the nuke plant I suppose. Plenty of room on those sites.

Expand

Most Australians now either favour nuclear or at least want it investigated especially with the catastrophic, destructive Bowen on the loose.
5 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ASE

Astute delivers high-grade lithium hits at Red Mountain

Rokeby, BHM, more: The 10 hot stocks HotCopper users watchlisted in Week 30

Friday's HotCopper trends: Renascor concentrate, Larvotto raise | July 25

Most investors will get this earnings season wrong. Will you?

ASX Market Close: Fading miners drag bourse as iron ore price slumps | July 25

RNU

Renascor produces graphite concentrate at Siviour, right on time to meet ex-China demand

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 019 – Dreaming of the 9,000s

SGQ

St George banks $5M from placement to ramp up Araxá Rare Earths Project

FTL

Firetail scoops up untested land around Excelsior – including juicy mineralisation target

What is going on here? Watch out for DroneShield, Pure Hydrogen, and Nel ASA

First 171 Last

SPONSORED BY