Snowy 2.0 boss says NetZero is ‘bullsh*t’, page-81

First 81 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Bananabender1

11,738 Posts.

10

24/05/24

17:08

Post #: 73999021
Share

Originally posted by zipperlip: ↑

“There is no modelling for historical data”?

Flipping Heck, how dumb are you.

How accurate do you think the collected data is from when Mose’s was wearing short shorts, when the Battle of Hastings occurred, when the first human spotted a kangaroo?

What did they use to record the daily temperature, Co2 level’s and the annual rainfall?

99.99% plus of all temperature records are based on modelling and assumptions based on best guesses.

The history of science is littered with inaccuracies, compounded by eggspurts who have built their credentials on lies/half truths and misinformation while anyone who has ever pointed out/suggested alternative explanations to the Consensus of the Day has been attacked/ridiculed for daring to question the Group Think.

Galileo is a great example, the 2 doctors who raised awareness of the Thalidomide effecting newborn babies or even the bloke who gave himself stomach ulcers and cured himself.

Or perhaps you prefer the Cane Toad experiment as an example of how switched on the CSIRO’s scientific consensus was back in the day.

Being smarter today than yesterday doesn’t negate the fact that humanity still doesn’t know that much.

Proper scientific research is about learning and proving it isn’t about accepting the consensus as an indisputable fact.

Expand

Huh?? You've lost the plot Zipper. Why would you need modelling for historical data? Modelling is used to simulate the future.

Geez man.
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

WIN

'Incorrect datasets': Old irony sets WIN Metals up for golden opportunity at Emjay

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

LKY

Locksley Resources the latest speccy to surge on US critical minerals hype

Tuesday's HotCopper trends: Sayona intercepts, Bowen Coking crisis | July 15