Let me spell it out for you. The conflict of interest is the sale of an asset by BEL to its related party, LEL.
LEL shareholders cannot be confident that this deal was done in their best interests, since it was negotiated by the same people on each side.
It seems that you are the only person who cannot see that this is a conflict of interest.
Ann: BEL: Disposal of Rare Earth Tenements vis Sale of Subsidiary, page-97
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 20 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add LEL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
37.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $41.44M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
| LEL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable