''Nuke tech had some merit 2 decades ago''
I would say closer to 40 or 50 years ago --
the folly of it for Oz now is to be thinking of it far too late with no established industry and as, if not more importantly - no large STEM educated people - and the one's we do have are heading OS at a great rate of knots - and STEM ed and research funding in Oz has been gutted - the very thing you need to begin a nuclear industry
so aside from all the other obstacles - the STEM drought is what needs to be thought through timing wise - and that's probably almost a 20 year rebuild - BEFORE one can start
''Nuclear???
It would take a special kind of madness to do so''
yes it would - unless one is thinking about 30 years in the future
16 years to rebuild the STEM part of the Oz equation - Ed and experience, then a 10 year building program --
to think it as people conceive Dudd's great big nuke idea - IS MADNESS (if Dud is serious, if he's not - then, it's just plain vanilla bs - which, IMO - is the latter)
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Nuclear?
Nuclear?, page-106
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
LU7
Discover the strong preliminary feasibility of the Bécancour Lithium Refinery, showcasing resilience in a low pricing environment and a strategic plan to capitalize on future price recoveries
NEWS
Antler Copper Project hits major permitting milestone – air quality permit advances to final review