Take a Paws, page-33621

  1. 25,660 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 34
    Whatever event that you look at to get a opinion you have to, in today's world dissect it into it's components

    To arrive at the guilty verdict covers many items -- are they all clear and compelling ?

    Most matters do not require you to be a scientist, lawyer or a doctor, they just take an ability to observe and logically evaluate

    There were many legal items that did not make sense in this farce of a court case and if you look at legal definitions they were simply ridiculous from a common sense perspective

    Ultimately any suggestion that this court case represents a real crime is saying that the legal system and hundreds of years of precedence has been thrown out the window

    It was a political stunt, no more, no less
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.