Stage One from Wood being “expected” by June quarter is a bit indefinite for me to take it as a certainty Frederic0 - especially as the guy from Wood and whoever he is working with are all professional people who I imagine are used to working to deadlines .
That being said, it’s a difficult environment right now in which to set deadlines with lots of chopping and changing going on ( ie workers getting poached to to other companies) and plenty of delays..
- So I think it’s appropriate for AVL to use the qualifier “expected” in its announcements .
— But - coming back to the professionalism aspects and working to deadlines :
This part of the OFS is only to “finalise trade off studies and “inform” a preferred development pathway”
They have had since February 1 and already had all the data from their own previous BFS on AVL as a stand alone project .
- so yep - despite the caution - I agree with you this basic info ought NOT to drag out !
cheers
(20min delay)