That's rich.
Where is there anywhere an expert, peer review, scientific document anywhere in the known world that says, that the:1. NextHERIZON
2. NeoHERIZON
3. NeuHERIZON
IMPRINTER
trials have failed or are failing? Yet they all have. Some didn't even get started. There are no experts or peer reviews or scientific documents written about IMU's trials because its progress is just not serious enough to attract any. And if you're waiting for the company itself to admit that a trial or product has failed, you might as well wait around for the Easter Bunny. IMU's management just don't have the integrity in them to do so.
@Mason14 's opinion is one of the best we have. Your "I don't understand the science, I just know Mason is wrong" argument is pathetic. And probably quite expensive as well.
Why IMU is a multi multi bagger, page-24369
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 602 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add IMU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
5.7¢ |
Change
0.002(3.64%) |
Mkt cap ! $417.2M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 5.6¢ | 5.9¢ | 5.5¢ | $1.176M | 20.89M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 1135235 | 5.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 5.8¢ | 477220 | 6 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 25/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| IMU (ASX) Chart |