Wooooo Hooooo Go BPH :)$$$$$$, page-29411

Kolubara,

Unfortunately, people like her need to justify a cause, to be in existance.

Without a cause nothing seperates them and they cannot create a position for themselves.

There will always be backers in the minority that get some over the line

In the case of the teals, Mr Holmes a court who has investments in green energies.

In his case he funded the teals, provided staff and provided training..

This is why there narrative is the same.

They are not independants, but a collective. A stealth party I believe.

If we look at Andrew Wilkie, Jackie lambie, Pauline Hanson, bob katter they are Independants in the true sense, due to there being no uniform agenda or the same backer behind them.

Prior to the last election, the teals should have disclosed there financial backer was the same and all recieved the same supports with there campaigns.

It was coordinated.

A dangerous precedent to have a rich person behind the scenes.

Ie. He may have wanted liberal out, so preferences to Labour, if he wants Labour out alters preferences to liberal. A theory.

That can not occur with Hanson, lambie, katter or Wilkie.

Overall ethical stands are certainly short of where they were in the 1960s to the 1990s and early 2000s.