BIDEN, page-3367

@Glug
So other than parroting the spin, tell me how it would be that an in/v that is recorded and the transcript is already released and no there is no issue with national security afoot...tell me how and what mechanism is so dreadful that to have BOTH the transcript and the audio to compare and ensure veracity of the transcript would impede future investigations/

It doesn't and its a nonsesne

Imagine a felon being i/v in police station and there is a recording used and a confession gained. Now imagine the DPP at trial presents just the written transcript and refuses to release the video? Ludicrous, of course, and you lot know it that would NEVER stand

The reason we all know is it is either that
1. the transcript was redacted
or
2. the audio is so bad...the pauses and obvious confusion heard are so bad... that they would destroy the POTUS

Too bad.

We have the right to know

@thecurious1
We've been down this path a few times and the rules for the EP don't apply here given the declassification and lack of national security issues

Soooooo...just to be clear...you know that...and I'm guessing you agree with those conventions but...seeing its your turnip...you're ok with him breaking those procedures cause its good for your party and f#$k the country's need to know.

Got it

Well we don't have to accept it as Garland is finding out