What you are putting up in an OPION piece that supports YOUR opinion.
Do you have the sources for the 'assumptions"...if not then we can play who has the biggest all day.
Why will you not also accept other 'pieces' that say 100,000 k's+ required to break even for the C02 deficit that have to be clawed back via nature...because it doesn't suit your OPINION.
Noting in that biased paid for commentary carries any weight.
