If I understand this correctly, ASIC were unable to prove that JK manipulated revenue in order to earn the PS. Whilst I am astounded by this, I accept the rule of law in a democratic and lawful country. Whilst there were several findings by the court about JK that his supporters would find anathema to their cult like hero worship of him, it would be ingenuous of me not to recognise his win on the point of the PS.
Yet who has won?
Clearly JK and those close to him have had a signal victory here but this has not helped the "10,000" retail shareholders we keep hearing about. This outcome will make a European IPO harder instead of impossible with JK as CEO given the findings.
I remain saddened about the prospects for the Australian retail shareholders and disgusted by the JK promoters.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SP1
- ASIC v ISX Hearing
ASIC v ISX Hearing, page-3457
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 147 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SP1 (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online