I started a thread that modelling should be based on cost of the life cycle of renewables compared to the life cycle of a nuclear plant!
Guess what, the lobbyist for renewables are avoiding to tackle my questions…. they’re hoping that pro nuclear supporters ignore this valid question!
The life cycle of renewables is estimated to be about 25 years, compared to a nuke plant being between 80 - 100 years..
Even under current pricing the replacement cost of renewables surpasses the end cost of building a nuke plant!
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Nukes plant equivalent to 4 renewables life time!
Nukes plant equivalent to 4 renewables life time!
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 126 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
GML
Gateway Mining sells WA Eastern Montague gold project to Brightstar for $14M – half of that in shares
MND
Albemarle lithium downsize burns $200M hole in Monadelphous's pocket as latter's contracts terminated
AVH
Avita boosts skin restoration product portfolio with 'dermal matrix' – a kind of next-level gauze made of fake skin
Featured News
AVH
Avita boosts skin restoration product portfolio with 'dermal matrix' – a kind of next-level gauze made of fake skin
MND
Albemarle lithium downsize burns $200M hole in Monadelphous's pocket as latter's contracts terminated
STX
Strike hands $48.5M contract to Clarke Energy to produce 20x 4.5MW gas engines for Sth Erregulla