''EQN claim to have the Negative Cerium Anomaly but until we get actual data who knows both sides can only make assumptions.''
You support Mho's ''garbage'' theory, though you've just shot yourself in the foot by admitting EQN has IAC deposits.
Sounds like you're putting more weight to RAU results (25-30 km's away) rather than EQN's which is right next-door........
Doesn't make any logical sense to me.
From EQN's June ANN.
What? Do you think EQN are lying?
Enova Mining - Charting/TA Thead - 3c target then 6.3c, page-2748
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 318 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
