If the receivership was a proactive move (instead of reactive), it would show clear intent that MAQ aims to clear it's balance sheet of the secured loan.
The move was made in reaction to the board filing for voluntary administration; allowing MAQ to protect its security in the event MAH took legal action.
If CAI can find a way to repay MAH, and MAQ have no intention of disposing of its loan or hedge book, we'll be able to resume trading but at a significant cost.
Waiting game.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CAI
- Ann: Administrators Appointed
Ann: Administrators Appointed, page-112
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 99 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CAI (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
11.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $93.67M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
CAI (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable