So, reviewing this announcement, I have yet another technical query for the company similar to my comments on the failed NSAMT survey in NAM.
The question is: Why are no resistivity numbers published, despite these extremely likely to be available from the IP survey?
Seems odd to leave them out given, used in conjunction can show where mineralization is.
I hope the company considered resistivity in planning these drill holes, but I am wondering, as the first hole for example appears to not be targeting anything except maybe a mineralization pathway?
This missing data ought to be addressed in an upcoming release.
Ann: Drilling Underway Testing Cu-Au Targets at Havilah, NSW, page-11
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add GED (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.123M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 71654 | 3.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0¢ | 150000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 22/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| GED (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable