Thanks Rhys.
Personally and so far, I think ‘14 for one’ has only been validated as a ‘better’ deal for those who sold at 2c a share or higher immediately the merger was done, and those for whom very low cost entry at TMT means those extra two shares offer significant insulation - even at these prices.
I am no number cruncher. It’s just my gut feel.
That some of the low cost early shareholder entrants to TMT also controlled TMT management from the back seat..
(to the extent that Station Nominees and potentially other large, ‘free carried’ ebtities are linked to Cicero - the employer of the past CEO etc )
..is of great concern to me especially when long term TMT holders have recently come out ‘dissing’ AVL management (which I assume they do NOT control) with abuse and trying to incite others to do the same.
Something rotten in the state of Denmark?
It sure smells like it to me and - far more than I want EPA approval - I’d like to see clear evidence of a united major shareholder base along with a Top 20 list that shows a more even balance of power.
cheers
AVL Price at posting:
1.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)