Ann: Strategy Funded for 18 months - Jupiter Rising, page-136

AE25:

I’ve had many conversations in the past with the (BOD) and their words never matched their actions. Basically, liers.

During a conversation they tend to make you feel good, important and listen with interest for that moment. And they always have good and positive things up their sleeves to tell you.

However, their words don’t necessarily match the words that come out of announcements. It always paints a different picture. Whilst all the while they’ve got you by the short and curly’s.

Hence, I believe to get any change happening or to be listened to, shareholders should do it “Collectively” like a “Notice of Motion” that is been done.

This is something you’ll are all ready aware of on “Telegram”. However, we do have some shareholders in the top 20 that seem’s to play the fiddle at both ends. And then there are some shareholders that also have becomes the BOD’s lackey or porn-star because think that they are more privileged and know more than others as they get to listen on Chinese whispers, through which ever means: eg: phone calls; emails or LinkedIn.

What shareholders don’t realise is that at the end of the day they will treat you’ll like shit house flies and squated on after they have used and finished with you’ll. This is sad truth whether shareholders like to believe it or not. Hence, I don’t bother calling them. I much rather have better outlines in announcements with clear agenda, better time line, itemised costings to justify expenditure, etc.

Please do your own research and DD. This is not financial advice. This just my opinion.