Relying on evidence from the WNA is just dumb. They're pretty well known for stretching the facts .
Post the part where the WNA specifically talks about nuclear for the Australian grid. How nuclear will fit in to an already 40% clean energy grid ? A grid that is expected to be nearly 100% clean energy by 2035 ?
Post the facts from WNA.
Why is it that countries that have had nuclear industries for over 75 years are building renewables ?
Why are all those countries spending far more on renewables than nuclear ?
Where are we going to get the water for our nukes ? The water allocations for the coal plants are committed to mine repatriation for decades to come .
Why aren't the electricity generators of Australia who own the coal sites not expressing any interest in nuclear at all ? Why are they all converting to renewables ?
Are you saying that AGL and Engie doesn't know as much about grid generation than Dutton ?
