I read a few of your recent posts - do you think Mesoblast have shown that the good results obtained from just three donors in the Study 001 (I'm assuming you know that) can be reliably attributed to the specific potency assay components that MSB used (specifically level of TNFR1 s and inhibition of IL2Ralpha on co-cultured T cells) OR do you think that because those three donor were essentially young healthy donors they might have had potent cells for other reasons?
Only way I think you can actually have a fair and impartial view is if you understand some science. Without it a person is going to be casting around deciding who they want to believe - in a sort of choose your conspiracy theory or theorist of choice.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)