In the CFE presentations, Marampa has been valued at 300-500m. Why is this so much more than Mayoko which has similar metrics as far as I can tell.
Also, I question the supposed value of 500m, when CFE paid 31m in equity for the last 65%. I am a holder of CFE but I question the value that TS has placed on Marampa. Seems excessive to me. Anyone got a take on this?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CLE
- why is marampa apparently more valuable?
why is marampa apparently more valuable?
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
CC9
Chariot Corporation (ASX:CC9) refines Black Mountain strategy, launching Pilot Mine to seize U.S. lithium opportunity
Add CLE (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.73M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
CLE (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable