research reports and media, page-4279

Pradobefree, the last we were told is that the 2b peer review, would be combined with the 008 review and released together.
I see from the deck used in WA last week, that the 008 peer review was labelled on its own in the upcoming catalyst section. Maybe that is a mistake or they labelled it that way for another reason, but we have been promised a 2b review for at least 4 years now and from their latest printed materials, it looks like we won't be getting one.

I do recall from 2 AGMs ago, the CEO who cried wolf, go off on a tangent and tell us that a 2b peer review didn't matter, because the FDA had granted him P3 status.... Just another misdirection, we can log into the journal.