Is nit picking on wording the best you can do?
I expressed that I thought the timing was just a good coincidence rather than a strategic plan (it obviously was). I was stating it mildly in order not to offend the person I was correcting. In reality, it was very obvious that the news was announced as it happened, it obviously wasn't going to be held up JZ's sleeve waiting for a strategic moment.
Anyway, despite me saying I didn't think it was strategic timing, literally correcting someone else who thought it was, you claim that I believed it was strategic (a blatant lie).
You then nit pick over wording. Ignoring the substance of the other 95% of the post you were responding to, as is your usual strategy. Why have a rational discussion about the reality of the situation when you can nit pick a detail, twist and misrepresent it, say "Oh dear", "LMFAO" "be ashamed" "facepalm" etc as you always do, and turn the discussion into a stupid argument?
Notice it's always the bulls doing this in response to bears starting out trying to discuss the company?
And, yes, I'd say falling from 80c to under 7c counts as a tumbling share price. It has lost the best part of 50% since the beginning of this calendar year. It has more than halved since I sold earlier this year. It has made five consecutive lower highs. If AGY's doesn't count as a tumbling share price, it'll do until one comes along which does
"LMFAO, facepalm, be ashamed, do better, oh dear, etc"
The fact that you (you're not alone but you're the worst offender) drag discussions about the company into stupid bun fights to avoid focussing on the company, and you're so incredibly and consistently dishonest, says so much. You'll tell masses of ridiculous blatant lies then nit pick other people over typos and wording or errors they made.
Expand
(20min delay)