HALOS Study Results
"97% of participants showed clinically meaningful overall improvement on the SAS-CGI-C, which evaluates clinicians' impressions of AS symptoms in study participants."
I interpret this as according to the study participants' doctors there was a trend of improvement, but despite the trend, the results across the group failed to reach statistical significance. This is how researchers make something sound better than it is.
Angelman trial, page-69
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NEU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$13.13 |
Change
0.020(0.15%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.678B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $13.20 | $13.44 | $13.07 | $5.021M | 378.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 11501 | $13.12 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $13.18 | 1539 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 18/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NEU (ASX) Chart |