Germany now knows
how wrong they were.
Bahahaha.
So selective. take out hydro (or only count what was built in the last 10 or 15 years)...Biomass, even you Cant count that as green & beneficial for the planet.
How much was spent for that 'result' in part time/ never 24/7/365 power.
Here is a better representation of power so that you don't get a false understanding due to a biased graph.
Nuclear output is actually climbing (despite Germany).
And when you take out Hydro (which accounts for OVER 50% of your or MORE than wind, solar & other COMBINED ) your claimed 'new' power looks like nothing more than a lie ..or an attempt at deception, the result is piss POOR for the spend.
Why cant green power tell the whole truth, rather than representing their bias????
Call it a LIE.
Claims that wind and solar power are much cheaper than other energy sources are wildly deceptive given governments across the globe had to spend $2.7 trillion on the green transition last year alone.
and they want to spend a further $18 trillion by 2030.....this will not make the world a cleaner greener place.
The world needs to spend at least $US12 trillion, or more than $A18 trillion, over the next six years on renewables and grid infrastructure if it is to meet the climate targets set out at last year’s COP28 conference, according to a new study.
View attachment 6336069
