No, this is ridiculous. You can't just read a paper and think you understand what it means, furthermore comprehend what the implications are in a public health setting.
We are so beyond debating the science, if there remains debate within the science WHY NOT LEAVE IT TO PEOPLE THAT ARE ACTUALLY QUALIFIED!
The real topic for debate by non-expert / average citizens, is what sort of society do we want? Do we want a society where fringe, extremist groups dictate which laws are to be obeyed, which public health orders are to be obeyed or not? Or is Australia going to strict with its current form of representative democracy, where leaders are elected, they fill roles with authority, the laws and authority of the Government are respected by law abiding citizens or law enforcement deals with them.
If you are an AntiVaxxer that rejects Government authority and Australian laws, how are you any different from a Jihadi extremist seeking to establish sharia law in Australia?
