Who benefits from Low ARU SP?, page-42

referring to generic Instos misses the whole issue. The issue is with an Investor of influence that could be doing things that removes retail benefits and be stymieing things for the interests of a direct competitor, Not returning SH fair value? Does a SPP at 16c and not giving retail a fair/equal opportunity to participate indicate an effort at Fair Value for all SHs.. Talk is cheap and actions real. The Board et al itself has brought questions of Integrity and Independence into stark focus for questioning. The rejection of Shorting comments strongly appear to have their culprit. And colluding participants