I'm talking about the cost not what's in them, again, if SGQ assessed it and thought it's not a problem why not articulate that to the market given they've addressed other potential land use characteristics in the JORC table - you'd think it's worth a mention to ensure market is fully informed
with enough money most things are achievable on most projects but this project doesn't pass the pub test for me until I'm proven wrong and the elephant in the room is addressed. It's all about risk vs opportunity and for me this presents too much risk
good luck with your investment, just trying to raise what I see as some issues so people are fully informed. I'm not a holder, and have no interest in it going down or up
"The location of the old CBMM tailings dam, covering a part of the Mineral Resources, will have an effect on the ability to mine
the project. This effect may influence safety and also have a cost implication for the Araxá Project. These effects have not been addressed in any manner or form and will need to be included as part of the modifying factors for Mineral Resource to Mineral Reserve conversion"
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SGQ
- Ann: ACQUISITION OF HIGH-GRADE ARAXA NIOBIUM PROJECT
Ann: ACQUISITION OF HIGH-GRADE ARAXA NIOBIUM PROJECT, page-112
Featured News
Add SGQ (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
2.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $27.21M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
SGQ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable