I'm done.!!!!, page-40

If this is a correct record of events, why doesn't a shareholder (I can't because I no longer hold) ask at the next AGM if Mr Patterson revealed the offers he refers to in the above interview to the BOD? (what the offers actually were) and if he didn't reveal them to the BOD?, why didn't he? Otherwise the statement "not anywhere near the ballpark of what investors should get" could be argued is simply a subjective assessment by the person who received them?
You guys deserve better than this. The BOD is actually supposed to make decisions at all times in them best interests of shareholders.
Who is to know (or say) what these offers where? Whether or not they were in the best interests of shareholders (at the time)? if the facts aren't documented to the board? And if they were?... what were the circumstances to their rejection?
Just MO