I know Regal has been involved with RED before.
However, why would they increase their holding in the company and then lend their shares to shorters for a pittance in fees and then see the shorters destroy the share-price?
Maybe Regal actually see a bit of value investing in RED at current levels.
Ann: Becoming a substantial holder, page-8
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add VAU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
34.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.346B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 34.0¢ | 35.0¢ | 34.0¢ | $5.085M | 14.72M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 858546 | 34.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 35.0¢ | 1442173 | 31 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 16/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| VAU (ASX) Chart |