Australia's Nuclear Future, page-625

  1. 2,593 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 23
    The media release claims “90 per cent of baseload electricity, predominantly coal fired power stations, is coming to the end of life over the next decade”. The clear implication is that the proposed nuclear power rollout would replace those plants. In fact, we now have about 21 gigawatts of coal-fired electricity. Three of the 15 power stations – Eraring and Vales Point B in New South Wales and Callide B in Queensland – are certainly scheduled to close by 2034 and take with them about five gigawatts of generating capacity. If a future Coalition government were to build its proposed seven nuclear power stations, that would roughly replace the three units that are certain to close. If 90 per cent of the capacity does actually retire, as the media release said, the proposed nuclear program would replace only about 30 per cent of the removed generation. What would then keep the lights on?


    “The whole proposal is really a smokescreen. It is designed to hide the reality that a Coalition government would keep burning coal and gas for decades … No part of it is real, plausible or sincere. As a proposal, it is probably the most dishonest ever put before the Australian electorate.”

    Oh dear TSK TSK
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.