7's in Bible = SUPERNATURALLY inspired - free 500 page download, page-149

  1. 24,278 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1

    @angusmcfangledang

    "You didnt give valid points at all
    You changed from being a trinitarian to a unitarian which is nearly as silly"

    You're doing a ppm Decoy with your second line here. smile.png
    You didn't address the valid points I made, based on the Bible, use those verses to counter it.
    Hence, until you address them, you're not in the position to say there not valid.

    The clear Bible truth is, you don't need a pre-existing Son to send.
    Conception/birth from Mary, is still a literal Son, just not the way humans are.

    All sents, sendings are after he was raised in the word Due 18:18, Luke 2:40, 52 where he then grew in favor with God and was Baptized and sent into the world, just as the Clear example in John 17:18 shows.
    Gal 4:4 Unquestionably sets the time stamp of when he was sent, as above here.

    Did your pre-existing Jesus fall out of favor somewhere????????
    I hope you're not going to suggest, this is only speaking of the man aspect of Jesus, surely not?????
    -----------
    When I have mentioned Unitarian, is was really only to show, that they would be the closest to what I say the Bible shows.
    I belong to zero denomination, accept the Bible and who it represents.

    Unitarian - nearly as silly you say -> rarely have you countered my post, using what I quote and the Bible.
    In desperation you try and force some OT verses, to fit your seeds.
    Goodness me, we have many prophesies of the future one and not a single one even Hints at, this one pre-existed in some form, who would come down and take upon flesh or even more crazy, enter the womb of Mary.
    So why on earth would anyone create such a story, that clearly doesn't exist???????????????????

    Speaking of silly -> Michael being Jesus would take a bit of beating, hmmmmmm tongue.png
    -----------
    "You obviously havent researched the origin of unitarianism ,and also its proponents today,if you did you would see it was origen,and you would realise this belief leads to literal isreal are Gods people and zionism"

    You are effectively doing a ppm here, taring all reformers etc with the same brush and trying to give them the same roots.

    As above, do NOT tag me with what others do or follow, I did NOT come to my findings from some guys off the net etc, it was from the Bible.
    It was probably not much longer if any, than 12 mths or so, that I even come across Unitarianism.

    The Bible is clear, who is NOW God's Israel -> those of Jesus's.
    And I don't fall for the created term - Zionism etc
    The above two points, are only a snippet of the Big deceptions going on.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.