PER - Megathread, page-348

This is a very interesting discussion / debating point ..

I would, like RYZN, hope to see no split at all, as obviously for someone like myself, who doesn't hold millions of shares. it would be the case that a 5 to 1 split means that I will not then have the happy retirement I was looking forward to if the SP growth after a split is not significant

But, just thinking about it, I do get the very logical argument for splits being that the higher the SP for a business, the more investment confidence it generates, so it has pros and cons for existing holders at the same time, INCLUDING the directors!

the question then is if the BOD believes it's product has 99.99 percent chance of trial success what triggers them to make the decision either direction for or against a split.

either way, we will no doubt find out in due course... but I am with RYZN esp if a split means we can't go upsized fries at the maccas party