Industry news, page-2074

HeyLine I too am one of the long term holders who has not sold. But I don’t keep whining and moaning about where we are: I understand the value that the company is developing, appreciate the scientific basis on which it’s founded, and fully agree that the value will show itself based on the science. I have no problem understanding that there are things which are better not disclosed just now.
It’s nonsense to suggest that DT has influenced a move to CU6. Like many shareholders I have a few companies. I held CU6 and got a good profit from it before moving on, I was influenced by the fact that DT had bought in, not because of his role at RAC but because I followed him, and respected his opinion, from the days that he used to post on BIT. That was impressive stuff and showed that he knew his stuff and that’s why I take account of his positions, not just blindly following in from RAC.
It appears that you are getting a lot of angst from RAC are you really suited to this?