When the highly credible Washington Post first reported on the allegations regarding Fauci’s facilitation of beagle torture in Tunisia, here’s how the Bezos-funded paper framed it (emphasis added):
““Anthony S. Fauci was swamped by so many angry messages and threats that in late October his assistant quit answering the phone for two weeks. The U.S. covid chief got 3,600 phone calls in 36 hours, just as he and other Biden administration officials were preparing for the campaign to vaccinate young children…
Much of the onslaught stemmed from a viral and false claim that the agency Fauci leads, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, had funded a medical experiment in which beagles were trapped in mesh cages filled with diseased sand flies, according to four National Institutes of Health officials familiar with the calls.”
Of course, the viral claim — that Fauci had funded puppy maiming — initially reported as “false” turned out to be entirely accurate, which the paper itself conceded in June and which I reported on previously.
Related: Washington Post Admits It Lied About Fauci’s Beagle Torture Regime — For Years
More recently, WCW Project FOIA’ed emails and discovered that the NIH-funded Tunisian lab in question had confirmed the veracity of the Beagle torture claims on the same day Fauci denied them and, what’s more, the scientists who ran the experiments hands-on copped to it on Tunisian television — events which, one might assume, an outfit as well-resourced as the Washington Post might have been able to uncover fairly easily. It is, after all, nothing if not a Deep State mouthpiece — how could it not have deep connections to the State Department?
